The Caliph ʿUmar would seek to push out and repel any notion or idea of contagion from his mind, in order to gain certainty in the statement of the Prophet [sas] in negation of the superstition of contagion.

This book explains the reality of Tawḥīd al-Ulūhiyyah, or al-ʿIbādah (strict, pure monotheism in worship) and makes mention of its rulings, limits, conditions, excellence, evidences, foundations...

Indeed, it is true misguidance that you acknowledge what you used to reject [as error, falsehood) and you reject what you used to acknowledge [as truth].

This book explains the reality of Tawḥīd al-Ulūhiyyah, or al-ʿIbādah (strict, pure monotheism in worship) and makes mention of its rulings, limits, conditions, excellence, evidences, foundations...

A believing Muwaḥḥid, in his beliefs, feelings, emotions, speech and behaviour is governed by optimism, hope, certainty and reliance and he pursues his beneficial interests in this manner.

In the beginning of the 9th volume of Darʾ al-Taʿāruḍ, Shaykh al-Islām Ibn Taymiyyah speaks of the differing among the sects regarding how knowledge, acquaintance and guidance is acquired, is it through reason, or is it through revelation...

Its summary is that “There is no contagion” is upon its apparent meaning, and that the command to flee from the leper is carried upon recommendation...

What is the ruling on instituting secular laws? And is it permissible to act by them? And does a ruler become a disbeliever by instituting these laws?

This person asks about the Sharīʿah ruling concerning the ruler who rules by the French secular laws alongside the knowledge that he claims Islām, prays, fasts and makes hajj.

The one who banishes the Shari’ah entirely and puts another law in its place, that this indicates that he views the [secular] law to be better than the Sharīʿah...