Is there a difference between a specific issue in which the qāḍī (judge) passes judgement with other than what Allāh revealed and between issues that are considered general legislation.

It is clear that there is no difference between ruling in a matter, or ten or a hundred or a thousand, or less or greater than that.

Taḥkīm [making a law a reference point] is unlawful when it is based upon a false (bāṭil) Sharīʿah which opposes the Book and the Sunnah.

A statement of Ibj Jibrīn overlooked and not given any attention by the Takfīriyyah, Quṭbiyyah, Surūriyyah whose methodology is blanket takfīr of rulers, governments and inciting youth to revolt.

Shaykh Ibn ʿUthaymīn clarifies his position on the issue of the rulers instituting secular laws, replacing the Sharīʿah with them and when takfīr can be made of them.

Those who follow the secular laws which Shayṭān has legislated upon the tongues of his allies, in opposition to what Allāh, the Majestic and Elevated...

This is a quote from Aḥkām al-Qurʾān of al-Qāḍī Bakr bin ʿAlā al-Qushayrī al-Mālikī (d. 344H). Though the translation is accurate enough, the context is missing.

The following statement has been ascribed to Ibn Hajar [rh] and is claimed to be in the 13th volume of the Maktabah Salafiyyah print of Fatḥ al-Bārī...

A genocidal barbarian who justifies the slaughter (murder) of innocent babies and children for fear that one day, they may become fighters and resist racist, supremacist genocidal conquest against them.

Racist, ethnosupremacist, bloodthirsty Jews—who are denounced by other Jews—present a justification for the slaughter of children which they have inherited from Pharoah and his nightmares and which is reflected in their psychotic war jurisprudence.