Posted by Abu Iyaad
Wednesday, Jul 17 2024
Filed under Miscellaneous
SMALLPOX is among the conditions caused by unclean living conditions and malnutrition. These conditions arise on account of accumulated toxicity in the body coupled with malnutrition or deficiencies in important nutrients and minerals that would otherwise have aided in the efficient background expulsion of these toxins. They appear in places with poor sanitation, lack of clean water and and inadequate nutrition alongside overcrowding in towns and cities.
These diseases disappear as soon as these conditions are changed without any medical interventions. See Mortality Decline Before Introduction of Vaccines and Medical Interventions, which exposes the myth of vaccines being the cause of this decline. Rather, social reforms alone, were the cause of this decline. Recently, the other great myth, that vaccines have been proven safe, has been self-imploded by none other than a great don of the vaccine mafia, Dr. Stanley Plotkin, largely due to the fallout after the Covid-19 fraud and the mounting pressure on the industry as a whole.
Heavy metals (lead, arsenic etc.), toxic substances, synthetic or putrefying materials may enter the body through the water or food supply (and in a modern context of heavy industrialisation, through the air), and the body will attempt to remove them in numerous ways, one of which is expulsion through the skin, if other routes are not optimal or not possible. In such cases, the body aims to spare the kidney and the liver from the burden of detoxification, as this would lead to more serious health complications, and so it tries to eliminate trough the skin. The symptoms of diseases like smallpox (chickenpox, measles) are in fact detoxifying, healing and restorative processes of the body while the actual disease state (toxicity, departure from homeostasis) precedes symptoms.
The body seeks to eliminate these morbid or toxic materials through the skin, as the most efficient and necessary way. This is not a flaw, or weakness of the body, rather it is an intended, sophisticated process. The vitality of the person, and what steps he or she takes as remedy will affect the speed and efficiency of resolution. And this is why some people recover and in others it may linger for months or years. In allopathic medicine (through drugs and vaccines), the outward push of the body, is suppressed and the disease is pushed back inwards, leading to absence of resolution. The effect of this is that symptoms (the healing phase) are suppressed, and disease will then manifest later in life, in the same or other forms. This is taken by the misguided deluded vaccinologists as "elimination" of disease. The end result of this approach, after decades and decades of such malpractice is the appearance of chronic degenerative diseases and a general decline in the health and vitality of the population, and this is what we see happening to many populations.
We present below some fatāwā (legal verdicts) from the scholars of the daʿwah to Tawḥīd in the Arabian peninsula, from the early 19th century. These rulings were based on what was known through direct experience and instinctually, by what the fitrah naturally and instinctively deems repugnant, that pus and putrefaction could never be used as medicine. We also provide additional evidence for the truth of what is contained in their verdicts, in what follows at the end of their statements.
Note: Due to the propaganda efforts of the cow-poxers and pus-pushers, the world was led to believe that vaccines were solely responsible for the decline or elimination of certain diseases and that they are safe and effective. Both of these are myths, and verifiably proven to be so from numerous angles. However, these myths have persisted because of the immense power yielded by big pharma, which is owned by the same stakeholders who own big media and big tech.
Hence, most of the world, both non-Muslim and Muslim alike, considers that though there were some initial issues with vaccination in prior centuries, that has now been overcome and that vaccines are now a miracle of medicine. It was inconceivable that this doctrinal stranglehold could ever be shaken off, however, with the Covid-19 pandemic scam, the greatest medical and financial scam in world history, large swathes of conventional doctors and prominent figures in medicine and science are now seeing the entire fraudulent vaccine enterprise for what it is, with some of them declaring that they will never take another vaccine again.
Verdicts of the Scholars of the Daʿwah on Smallpox Inoculations
Shaykh Ḥamad bin Nāṣir bin Maʿmar (رحمه الله) (d. 1810 CE) was asked about inoculation (tawtīn). He replied:
The inoculation that is done by some of the common-folk where they take the pus of a person with smallpox , cut the skin of a healthy person and place it into that person, they claim that if he gets smallpox, it will be milder.
This is not [considered to be] from the talismans which are prohibited to be worn in what is apparent to us. Rather, it is from [the angle of] medicinal treatment for a disease before it occurs, similar to what they do with the person who gets smallpox, when he gets the smallpox fever. They dye his feet with henna so that smallpox does not appear in his eyes. This has been tried and found to have an effect. Those people claim that inoculation is from the ways that make smallpox milder.[1]
That which is apparent to us is that it is disliked because the one who does it is hastening the calamity before it occurs and because overwhelmingly, when he inoculates, he actually gets smallpox and it may even kill him.
Hence, the one who has done this has aided in killing himself as has been mentioned by the scholars about the who one ate more than [the level of] saturation and died because of it. So this is the angle of it being disliked.
Shaykh ʿAbd Allāh Abā Buṭayn (رحمه الله) (d. 1865 CE) said:
What is done to the child of what they call cutting (taʿḍīb), I do not know anything about it and I have not heard any mention of it in the first era. I do not know of its affair it but I dislike it.
And Shaykh ʿAbd Allāh, Shaykh Ibrāhīm, [who are] the two sons of Shaykh ʿAbd al-Laṭīf, and Shaykh Sulaymān bin Saḥmān replied:
This ‘tajdīr’[2] which some of the physicians called ‘inoculation’ and what some of the common-folk called ‘cutting’ (tawtīn, tʿaḍīb),[3] it is not permissible to use that. We have not come across anything of the speech of the scholars regarding it. Shaykh Ḥamad bin Nāṣir bin Maʿmar was asked about this, likewise Shaykh Abā Buṭayn and they both responded:” [and then they mentioned the two previous answers from them and then said]:
And the claim of those ignoramuses that this is from the permitted ways is a futile claim due to two reasons:
The first of them is that they do not use it after its occurrence and the appearance of its symptoms such that it can be considered from the angle of medicinal treatment. Rather, they do this [practice] so that it does not occur, but perhaps it will occur on account of it, and hence, it has simply hastened the occurrence of calamity before it would have occurred [by way of Allāh’s will, if He had willed it], and perhaps it might kill him so he would have aided in the killing of his own self.
The second: If this had been from the angle of medicinal treatment and taking the means, it would still be impermissible because it is treatment through a means that Allāh and His Messenger did not legislate. This is because inoculation is through pus which is impure (najas), or through something that is made from it. And medicinal treatment using the impure unlawful [substance] is not allowed and not permitted due to his (صلى الله عليه وسلم) saying: ‘O servants of Allāh, treat your illnesses but do not treat them with what is unlawful, for Allāh did not make cure for my nation in that which He made unlawful upon them.’
And we prevent [others] from this [practice], we do not allow it, and we punish the one who does it.
The sound verdicts of these scholars emanate from their fiṭrah, their purity and innocence (from foreign ideas) and represent a natural, organic reaction to this practice.
A Similitude
What was stated by the Shaykhs of the daʿwah was also said by intelligent people of the world in other places, and intelligence and sound judgement as it relates to worldly affairs can be found in both the believer and the disbeliever from among the People of the Book:[4]
“When Inoculation with Smallpox was introduced by Maitland in 1821, the Rev. Edward Massey preached a sermon against the practice, which led to a controversy; and in a letter Massey thus addressed Maitland—
“Inoculation, in your sense, is an engraftment of a corrupted body into a sound one ; an attempt to give a man a disease, who is in perfect health, which disease may prove mortal.
“This I said was tempting Providence.
“To which you reply, It resembles that of a person who leaps out of a window for fear of fire ; and surely that can never be reckoned a mistrust of Providence.
“No, certainly, Sir, if his house be really on fire, and the stairs burnt. ‘Tis the only probable way of safety left; and if the leap should kill him, the action could neither be called sinful or imprudent. But what should we say to a man who jumped out of the window when his house was not a-fire, only to try what he might perhaps be forced to do hereafter? This mad action exactly hits the case between us. For if my house be not on fire, that is, if I am in no apparent danger, what need I jump out of the window? What occasion is there to inoculate me?
“To carry on your own allegory, I would ask you, Sir, what human or divine authority you have to set a man’s house on fire, that is, put a man who is in perfect health in danger of his life by a fit of illness?”
Summary of the similitude: “Hey, jump out of the window of your house, even if the house is not on fire. No harm if you break a leg or an arm, at least you know what to expect when the house is on fire!” And also: “Hey, I am going to set your house on fire so that you can learn how to jump out of the window to save yourself, so that if and when your house is engulfed by a fire, you will know exactly what to do!”
So this is the point made by the Shaykhs of the Daʿwah, illustrated through a good similitude. Further below, we provide evidence that those who subjected themselves to these pus-inoculations were more prone to smallpox.
Notes
01 Regarding vaccination: It literally means “cow-poxing” and appeared or started to gain popularity in the 18th century. It gained financial and political backing during the 19th and 20th centuries based upon a combination of an incorrect theory of disease, fraudulent science, propaganda and money power. These elements were embodied in the French plagiarist and fraudster known as Louis Pasteur who played a significant role in cementing the false and inaccurate germ theory of disease for the 20th century upon which the modern day practice of cow-poxing is based.
Modern pharmaceutical companies follow the same track by using propaganda, bought or fake science and a discredited model of disease and immunity to make billions in profits. In the 21st century, their aim is to expand this lucrative cow-poxing model to include every person on the planet, desiring to raise their profits from the range of billions to the range of trillions, all on the back of a weaponised concept of contagion which is used to promote fear, belief in omens, superstition and control of people’s social and economic behaviour.
In the early 20th century, big pharma took over the medical industry and today, in the West in particular, most (not all) doctors have been compromised because their hands are tied (through regulatory agencies). They are effectively used as front-line dealers (for drugs and serum injections), just as they were used to sell cigarettes for the tobacco industry in the past, where fake, bought, manufactured science (pseudoscience) was used to peddle the goods. Nevertheless there are many good doctors, who after their initial training are objective and honest enough to acknowledge the reality of their industry. Most however, are enticed and kept in place by the money and the regulatory stranglehold.
Images: When doctors promoted cigarettes:
02 Vaccines are made by taking diseased matter from sick people which is then cultured through various mediums which include: monkey kidney tissues, chick embryos, dissected organs of human aborted fetuses, pig pancreatic hydrolysates of casein, calf blood serum, and others. Harmful proteins and residual genetic materials remain in these cultures and their removal by filtration and the likes is impossible which has been discreetly acknowledged, but kept hidden from public awareness.
These materials can lead to tumours and other harmful outcomes and this is why disclaimers are often made that vaccines have not been tested or evaluated for tumorogenic (cancer) potential and likewise, infertility. Poisonous substances such as formaldehyde, mercury (in the form of thimerosal) and aluminium are also added as adjuvants and they can pass into the brain leading to inflammation and the disease conditions which are related to that. Likewise, antibiotics such as neomycin are also included in vaccines, and they can interfere with absorption of important vitamins such as B6, thereby affecting vital functions in the brain and elsewhere.
Concerted efforts to conceal these affairs have always existed from the very beginnings of the practice of “cow-poxing” and today tremendous financial, political and legal power is used to defend this lucrative business model based upon poisoning the blood and tissue of healthy individuals. This early poisoning of the system leads to the birth of many diseases and chronic conditions later in life for which never ending markets are generated for big pharma. Basically, the more devitalised, chronically sick people, the greater the profits. This is what the entire vaccine program is about, it is to create and perpetuate markets over decades and lifespans. This entire enterprise is propagandized for through numerous myths: That vaccines eliminated so-called “infectious diseases” or reduced their mortality, this is false. That vaccines have been proven safe, this is false. That vaccines stop alleged “contagion”, this is also false.
Despite the above, due to tremendous pressure after the Covid-19 scam, when confidence in vaccines as a whole began to plummet due to what people experienced, the vaccine mafia have been forced to admit that vaccines (“cow-poxing”, “pus-injections”) have never been been proven safe because appropriate studies have never been done. This is a tremendous admission and it destroys one of numerous myths regarding vaccines. This very recent admission was made by Dr. Stanley Plotkin who is the don, the master of the vaccine program, and it represents an attempt to regain trust and confidence from the public.
03 A large body of evidence exists from historical records that much higher percentages of smallpox were found in those who were vaccinated for it and that the vaccine was frequently the cause of death (see further below). However, the promoters of vaccines (“cow-poxers”) were adept at renaming the cause of death to conceal the true numbers that died as a result of cow-poxing and its harmful effects. This fraudulent practice continues to this day, wherein cow-poxing related injuries and deaths are dismissed and the pretence is made that there must be some other cause. Some of the effects of cow-poxing are delayed (such as cancers later in life, infertility) and hence, the causal link may never be made at all. The dispute over cow-poxing has been ongoing for over two centuries and would be frequently and openly discussed in the Houses of Parliament in the United Kingdom. Money power, propaganda and fake or bought science—just as with tobacco in mid 20th century—continue to hold sway and exert tremendous influence.
Smallpox Inoculations Causing Smallpox Outbreaks
As evidence for the truth and accuracy of what was said by the Shaykhs of the Daʿwah to Tawḥīd in the early 19th century, we provide the following details:[5]
In England, compulsory vaccination against smallpox was first introduced in 1852, yet in the period 1857 to 1859, a smallpox epidemic killed 14,244 people. In 1863 to 1865, a second epidemic claimed 20,059 lives. In 1867, a more stringent compulsory vaccination law was passed and those who evaded vaccination were prosecuted. After an intensive four year effort to vaccinate the entire population between the ages of 2 - 50, the Chief Medical Officer of England announced in May 1871 that 97.5% had been vaccinated. In the following year, 1872, England experienced its worst ever smallpox epidemic which claimed 44,840 lives. Between 1871-1880, during the period of compulsory vaccination, the death rate from smallpox leapt from 28 to 46 per 100,000 population.
Writing in the British Medical Journal (21/1/1928 p116) Dr L Parry questions the vaccination statistics which revealed a higher death rate amongst the vaccinated than the unvaccinated and asks:
How is it that smallpox is five times as likely to be fatal in the vaccinated as in the unvaccinated?
“How is it that in some of our best vaccinated towns - for example, Bombay and Calcutta - smallpox is rife, whilst in some of our worst vaccinated towns, such as Leicester, it is almost unknown?
“How is it that something like 80 per cent of the cases admitted Into the Metropolitan Asylums Board smallpox hospitals have been vaccinated, whilst only 20 per cent have not been vaccinated?
“How is it that in Germany, the best vaccinated country in the world, there are more deaths in proportion to the population than In England - for example, in 1919, 28 deaths in England, 707 In Germany; In 1920, 30 deaths In England, 354. In Germany In 1919 There were 5,012 cases of smallpox with 707 deaths; in England In 1925 There were 5,363 cases of smallpox with 6 deaths. What is the explanation?
In Scotland, between 1855-1875, over 9,000 children under 5 died of smallpox despite Scotland being, at that time, one of the most vaccinated countries in the world. In 1907- 1919 with only a third of the children vaccinated, only 7 smallpox deaths were recorded for children under 5 years of age.
In Germany, in the years 1870-1871, over 1,000,000 people had smallpox of which 120,000 died. 96% of these had been vaccinated. An address sent to the governments of the various German states from Bismarck, the Chancellor of Germany, contained the following comments:
... the hopes placed in the efficacy of the cowpox virus as preventative of smallpox have proved entirely deceptive”.
In the Philippines, prior to US takeover in 1905, case mortality from smallpox was about 10%. In 1905, following the commencement of systematic vaccination enforced by the US Government, an epidemic occurred where the case mortality ranged from 25% to 50% in different parts of the islands.
In 1918-1919 with over 95% of the population vaccinated, the worst epidemic in the Philippine’s history occurred resulting in a case mortality of 65%. The highest percentage occurred in the capital Manila, the most thoroughly vaccinated place. The lowest percentage occurred in Mindanao, the least vaccinated place owing to religious prejudices.
Dr V de Jesus, Director of Health, stated that the 1918-1919 smallpox epidemic resulted in 60,855 deaths. The 1920 Report of the Philippines Health Service contains the following comments:
From the time in which smallpox was practically eradicated In the city of Manila to the year 1918 (about 9 years) in which the epidemic appears certainly In one of its severest forms, hundreds after hundreds of thousands of people were yearly vaccinated with the most unfortunate result that the 1918 epidemic looks prima facie as a flagrant failure of the classic Immunization towards future epidemics.
In Japan, 1885, 13 years after compulsory vaccination commenced in 1872, a law was passed requiring re-vaccination every seven years. From 1886 to 1892, 25,474,370 revaccinations were recorded in Japan. Yet during this same period Japan had 156,175 cases of smallpox with 38,979 deaths representing a case mortality of nearly 25%. In 1896, Japanese Parliament passed another act requiring every Japanese resident to be vaccinated and re-vaccinated every 5 years. Between 1889 and 1908, there were 171,611 smallpox cases with 47,919 deaths, a case mortality of 30%.
This case mortality exceeds the smallpox death-rate of the pre-vaccination period when nobody was vaccinated. It is noteworthy that Australia, one of the least vaccinated countries in the world for smallpox had only three smallpox cases. In 15 years, in comparison with Japan’s record of 165,775 cases and 28,979 deaths in only 6 years of compulsory vaccination and re-vaccination.
In an article, ‘Vaccination In Italy’ which appeared In the New York Medical Journal, July 1899, Chas Rauta, Professor of Hygiene and Material Medical in the University of Perguia, Italy, points out:
Italy is one of the best vaccinated countries in the world, if not the best of all, for twenty years before 1885, our nation was vaccinated in the proportion of 98.5%. Notwithstanding, the epidemics of smallpox that we have had have been something so frightful that nothing before the invention of vaccination could equal them. During 1887, we had 16,249 deaths from smallpox; in 1888- 18,110 and 1889, 13,413.
Professor Rauta has stated:
Vaccination is a monstrosity a misbegotten offspring of error and ignorance; it should have no place in either hygiene or medicine ....Believe not in vaccinaton, it is a world-wide delusion, an unscientific practice, a fatal superstition with consequences measured today by tears and sorrow without end.
From his book, The Vaccination Superstition, Dr J W Hodge writes:
After a careful consideration of the history of vaccination gleaned from an impartial and comprehensive study of vital statistics, and pertinent data from every reliable source, and after an experience derived from having vaccinated 31000 subjects, I am firmly convinced that vaccination cannot be shown to have any logical relation to the diminution of cases of smallpox....
Vaccination does not protect, it actually renders its subjects more susceptible by depressing vital power and diminishing natural resistance, and millions of people have died of smallpox which they contracted after being vaccinated.
In the USA, June 25th, 1937, Dr William Howard Hay addressed the Medical Freedom Society on the Lemke Bill to abolish compulsory vaccination. He stated:
l have thought many times of all the insane things we have advocated in medicine, that is one of the most insane - to insist on the vaccination of children, or anybody else, for the prevention of smallpox when, as a matter of fact, we are never able to prove that vaccination saved one man from smallpox...
I know of one epidemic of smallpox comprising nine hundred and some cases, in which 95 per cent of the infected had been vaccinated, and most of them recently...
It is now thirty years since I have been confining myself to the treatment of chronic disease ... I have run across so many histories of children who had never seen a sick day until they were vaccinated and who... have never seen a well day since...
In England, where statistics are kept a little more frankly and accurately and above board... than in this country the actual official records show 3 times as many deaths directly from vaccinations as from smallpox for the past twenty one years... I will guarantee you that there are 3 times as many deaths that were not recorded, that are directly traceable to vaccinations. That doesn’t take into account the many many cases of encephalitis or sleeping sickness, and of this or that form of degeneration, that occurs as the result of vaccination...
It is nonsense to think that you can Inject pus - and it is usually from the pustule end of the dead smallpox victim... it is unthinkable that you can inject that into a little child and in any way improve its health. What is true of vaccination is exactly as true of all forms of serum immunization, so called...if we could by any means build up a natural resistance to disease through these artificial means, I would applaud it to the echo, but we can’t do it...
The body has its own methods of defence. These depend on the vitality of the body at the time. If it is vital enough, it will resist all infections; if it Isn’t vital enough, it won’t, and you can’t change the vitality of the body for the better by introducing poison of any kind into it.
According to the official figures of the Register General of England only 109 children (under 5) in England and Wales died of smallpox in the twenty-three years ending December 1933, but 270 died of vaccinations in the same period in these two countries. Between 1934 and 1961, not one smallpox death was recorded and yet during this same period 115 children under 5 years of age died as a result of the smallpox vaccination. This ultimately forced the government to repeal the Vaccination Act for smallpox.
The situation was just as bad in the USA. An article in the July 1969 issue of Prevention Magazine stated that 300 children in the USA died from the complications of smallpox vaccine since 1948. Yet during that same period there was not one reported case of smallpox in the country. In October 1971, Dr Samuel Katz, Duke University Medical Centre, speaking at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Pediatrics said that an average of six to nine individuals die each year from smallpox vaccinations. Authorities eventually abandoned the vaccine as Dr Archie Kalokerinos points out:
About 10 - 15 years ago some of my colleagues in the United States gave me some very interesting information. They said that smallpox vaccination had been stopped, not because smallpox had been wiped out, but because they were having trouble with the vaccine. They would vaccinate an individual and that individual would give active smallpox to a contact. The whole thing was out of control and they weren’t game to use it.
This is probably why Professor Ari Zuckerman, a member of the World Health Organisation’s advisory panel on viruses has stated, “Immunization against smallpox is more hazardous than the disease itself.”
Even the British Medical Journal (1/5/1976) states:
It is now accepted that the risks of routine smallpox vaccination outweigh those of natural infection In Britain.
Closing Remark
The initial idea of these inoculations was along the lines that if small doses of arsenic or alcohol are taken, they will make a person immune from poisoning, or intoxication from higher doses. In the same way, if a person is exposed to a mild form of disease (through inoculation), they will fare better if they were to suffer the disease in future. While an enticing theory, when this was done on a large-scale, the realities became apparent and the harms were greater than the apparent benefits. This was noted very early on by the Shaykhs of the Daʿwah, even before the large scale rollout was made in other nations. What they observed and noted from their fiṭrah, as their natural, organic reaction and their innocence (from the influence of speculative materialist theories), proved to be true and it remains true to this day.
It is now established and admitted that most of those developing what is called “Covid-19” (largely a rebranding of respiratory illnesses, such as colds, flus, pneumonias etc.) are those who have been injected and boosted with the snake-oil mRNA injections. There are chronic and fatal conditions that develop in them, such as cardiac arrests, myocarditis, pericarditis, turbo cancers, neurological illnesses.
Footnotes
1. This is the original idea, that if you repeatedly subject yourself to small amounts of poison such as arsenic (or alcohol), then your body will be able to survive a large amount of poison, should you be subjected to it, and the consequences will be less severe, because your body has become accustomed to it. This idea was also applied to disease.2. Inducing a milder manifestation of disease, in this case, smallpox, as a means of protection from a more severe form.
3. Cutting the skin for the purposes of placing some material from a diseased person into it.
4. From the book: “SIR LYON PLAYFAIR Taken to Pieces and Disposed of: Likewise SIR CHARLES W. DILKE, Bart. Being a Dissection of their speeches in the House of Commons, on 19th June 1883 in defence of Compulsory Vaccination.”(1884, London), by William White.
5. A chapter from the book by Ian St. Clair, “Vaccination: The Hidden Facts”.
