See also: 1 In 4 mRNA injection Recipients Developed Heart Complications, A Study from Saudi Arabia Finds and also 1000 Peer Reviewed Medical Papers Submitted To Various Medical Journals, Evidencing A Multitude Of Adverse Events In Covid-19 Vaccine Recipients.
Amid a class action lawsuit brought by dozens of families seeking $100 million in compensation for dead relatives, in May 2024 Astrazeneca withdrew its Covid-19 jab that is based on chimpanzee fecal technology.[1] They claimed it is due to decreasing demand due to presence of other vaccines which is a half-truth. The demand has been decreasing because of the dangers associated with it, and also because Astrazeneca fears further lawsuits and financial loss. Hence, they withdrew the injection after making admissions that the injection causes harm during the lawsuit.
Trouble started for Astrazeneca early on in March 2021, only a few months in, when people began to experience blood clots and their complications and more than a dozen countries suspended the injection. Given this, and other information which was readily apparent at this time (such as the blatant fraud used by the vaccine companies in using relative risk reduction rather than absolute risk reduction, to deceive health authorities and governments, to promote, market and sell their injections), I advised with caution, given that we are simply seeing a repeat of the Swine Flu Scam of 2009 (must read for background knowledge, short, only 2 minutes).
Further, in a court case in early 2022, Pfizer was ordered to release close to half a million pages of documents (of clinical and trial data) which it had tried, in collusion with the FDA, to hide for 75 years from the public, when most people on earth today would be dead, something which stinks of "Trust the science." One of the documents Pfizer tried to hide was a report on the first three months of vaccine rollout (December 2020 to February 2021). The report indicated over 1200 deaths (page 7, Table 1), and over nine pages listing over 1200 individual side effects of special interest anticipated from the injections (pages 30 to 38). Many of these harms began to be reported in the scientific literature.
Also in all Pfizer agreements and contracts for the injections, it is explicitly stated:"The Participating member state further acknowledges that the long term effects and efficacy of the vaccine are not currently known and that there may be adverse effects of the vaccine that are not currently known" (see screenshot). In other words, the rollout was a clinical trial to test if the injections were safe and effective, while being falsely marketed as "safe and effective", and which eventually turned out to be neither, given that you need 7 boosters on top of the initial two doses. This was actually part of the scam, to create a market where everybody needs to be injected every three months to maintain "immunity" against the crafty, evasive, mutating Darwinian virus, playing devil against mankind. These mutating variants (or "scariants") are imaginary, and exist only on computer (in silico), because their nucleic acid sequences are generated, fabricated (not discovered) using computer software programs. They do not exist in physical reality.
Coming to the report, in Morocco, a female doctor filed a lawsuit against the health authority, seeking compensation for damages. She was paralyzed in the face and lower limbs after taking the Astrazeneca injection.
Dr. Najat Touati, a researcher at Ibn Tufail University, filed a lawsuit against the Ministry of Health and Social Protection, demanding compensation for the damages she suffered after receiving the AstraZeneca vaccine, accusing the vaccine of causing paralysis in the face and lower limbs.
In an unprecedented decision, the Rabat Administrative Court awarded her compensation of 250,000 Moroccan dirhams, equivalent to 25,000 US dollars.
Commenting on the case, government spokesman Mustapha Paytas said that “all vaccines approved in Morocco can only be used after they are approved by scientific committees.”
AstraZeneca announced on Tuesday that it had begun withdrawing its COVID-19 vaccine from around the world, due to the “surplus of updated vaccines available” since the outbreak of the pandemic, it claimed.
The company’s move to withdraw the meeting comes in conjunction with the British judiciary’s consideration of a series of lawsuits filed by citizens who were affected after taking the vaccine, which prompted the company to admit the emergence of side effects that may be serious for a percentage of vaccine recipients.
North African News — 10 May 2024.
Given, this, one should revisit the issues that were raised in an article written in mid-2021, the year of the experimental injection rollout which raises important questions that have not yet received scholarly consideration in light of the factual realities that had already unfolded by that time, which is three years ago.
Essential summary: Fatwās of scholars on the permissibility or commendation of taking preventive treatments cannot be used to vilify people who live in lands where they are not required to take injections and still have free choice in the matter. They cannot be deemed sinful or having opposed Allāh and His Messenger (رحمه الله). Further, the ḥukm sharʾiyy of a Muslim authority effectively forcing subjects (albeit in an indirect way) to take an unproven, experimental injection, tying their livelihood and movement to it, while there exist many alternative preventive and curative treatments has not been adequately addressed. These fatwās on permissibility of preventive treatment do not constitute proof in that matter and cannot be used. Rather, a specific fatwā must be sought regarding this scenario with a full and accurate account of the facts given, inclusive of all the revelations and developments to date.
My stance on this whole issue has always been very clear and apparent, and the essence of it can be read here:
I was targeted by a number of students of knowledge (without any background in medicine or science) who began to make complaints about me to some mashāyikh, claiming that I was going to kill people with misinformation, that I oppose the scholars and rulers, that I accuse them of ignorance and not knowing “fiqh al-wāqīʿ” and so on, and all of this was based upon either a misunderstanding of my speech, which was detailed and precise, or a deliberate distortion of it.
The affair reached a crescendo in November 2021, when specific accusations were made against me which I disagreed with and for which I had not been presented with any direct evidence. However, for the sake of unity, I wrote a couple of clarifications in order to quosh the issue, with my knowledge that the realities would unfold eventually in a year or two’s time, just as they had quickly unfolded in the Swine Flu Scam of 2009, when I also spoke about the very same things back then, namely the issue of contagion and views therein, snake-oil injections and sensationalist virus fearmongering by the media.
I did not oppose the scholars and rulers in what amounts to opposition to Allāh and His Messenger (صلى الله عليه وسلم). Yes, I oppose some of the scholars and most of the rulers in the matter of contagion, as I hold its negation, following many of the Salaf and great scholars to this day of ours, as the strongest, most insightful and most protective of the views upon beliefs and behaviours. Hence, it cannot be said here, “You oppose the scholars” with the meaning that you oppose Allāh and His Messenger and the truth.
Yes, I oppose lockdowns, universal masking of healthy people and social distancing of six-feet as these are all medical heresies and are proven to be so. It is not possible for anyone, now in 2024, to continue believing that these are from the ways and means backed by evidence, since the people of disbelief have all but admitted that these were not based on science and were destructive and harmful to society. Allāh and His Messenger (صلى الله عليه وسلم) do not command or commend what is harmful and destructive to society. However, this is from a knowledge point of view, while practically speaking, I continually advised that we must not cause commotion and disturbance, abide by the regulations and have patience over any difficulties and hardships, and make supplication for the Muslim rulers that they are guided to what is correct in these difficult circumstances. This is not "opposition to the rulers" in what entails opposition to Allāh and His Messenger (صلى الله عليه وسلم), since no one can be forced to believe in error and falsehood, especially not in differed over affairs in worldly sciences.
I oppose vaccination in principle as it is a fraudulent enterprise and built upon myths, propaganda and pseudoscience, and I am not alone in this. Rather, mainstream doctors who were hardcore vaccine believers are now rejecting vaccination wholesale because the Covid-19 fraud opened their eyes. Across the board, not just with Covid-19 injections, there is a decline in vaccine uptake, especially among medical staff and doctors. Some prominent ones have sworn never to take another vaccine again.
See: "A Common-sense Approach to Childhood Vaccines is Now Needed" by the World Health Council for a quick overview of the issue (1-2 minute read).
Hence, in the issue of vaccines, it cannot be said here that you oppose the scholars with the meaning that you oppose Allāh and His Messenger (صلى الله عليه وسلم), because this is a worldly matter of differing in matters of medical theories.
No one has the the right to force anyone to accept a medical theory, especially one that is inseparable from Darwinian evolution, as is the case with the fraud and pseudoscience of virology which fuels superstition and unwarranted fear that can be weaponised for plunder and profit, with gross exaggeration in the matter of contagion.
Shaykh Muqbil (رحمه الله) who negates contagion explains, naturally, that to take vaccines for the purpose of ending contagion, given that it is a negated concept, is unlawful (in this view). One can take a vaccine to prevent or lessen severity of disease (as is claimed), but not for ending contagion, since the Messenger (صلى الله عليه وسلم) negated that. The Shaykh is proven correct in this since no vaccine prevents contagion, including the Covid-19 injections, this is readily admitted. Hence, even on this issue, to oppose vaccination from this angle, this is not "opposing the scholars" with the meaning of opposing Allāh and His Messenger and being sinful thereby. Rather, this is following a legitimate, evidence-based view that relates to protection of creed, just as it relates to protection of worldly interests.
Related video: Pfizer Director Admits in EU Parliament 'Vaccine' Was Not Tested for Preventing Transmission.. Dutch MEP Rob Roos forces Pfizer Director to make a stunning admission, rendering all claims of "stopping the spread" and "preventing transmission" to be cheap lies.
Related video: Dr. Paul Marik Explains a Trail of Lies Told About the 'Vaccine' Including the Lie of Preventing Transmission.. Quote: "They've lied about everything. They told us the shot would stay in the arm. That's completely false. They told us the shot would prevent transmission which is not true."
Related article: FDA: Vaccines Don't Have to Prevent Infection or Transmission. It is almighty strange that even when the FDA informs the world that "Vaccines do not require demonstration of the prevention of infection or transmission", people still believe that these vaccines are for the purpose of "preventing transmission."
Hence, vaccinations can be offered as a matter of personal choice and encouraged. But for them to be effectively forced upon people under threat of deprivation of livelihood, especially when they are experimental, have no safety profile and are manufactured by convicted corporate criminals and murderers, with evidence of fraud surfacing at the very beginning, this is a matter that is in need of a scholarly answer. It has not been adequately addressed. While some accused those who advised with caution and care with respect to these vaccines, this does not appear to be the position of the officially appointed scholars of Saudi Arabia. The official state position is that the Covid-19 vaccines were a choice and they are only encouraged, not forced. Shaykh al-Fawzān (حفظه الله), when asked in late 2021 by some brothers in Riyāḍh whether a person was sinful for taking the injection said no.
Thus, to declare thousands of Muslim doctors all across the world to be sinful for doing their professional and Islamic duty (giving their patients sincere advice based on evidence), is a mighty thing.
The officially stated view of the Saudi health agency (in January 2022) was that no one was forced to take the Corona injections, they were only encouraged, and they were not forced or obligatory.
I gave practical, pragmatic advice to people who found themselves in a predicament regarding these vaccines. This was along the lines that if you can get a lawful exemption, do so. If not, do not take the mRNA injections (Pfizer, Moderna), they are more likely to harm you, short term or long term, and avoid also the chimpanzee feces vector injections (Astrazeneca, Johnson). Instead, go for other brands that do not use these mechanisms. Failing that, if you do not have this option, I can give you steps to take and advise supplements to take to limit potential harms. These steps included the use of the website HowBad.Info to check on safety of batches for various manufacturers and ensuring you get a safe batch.
Although many people who were averse to taking these vaccines, and for good reason, asked me in private whether they could buy a certificate without taking the injection, I refused to give them an affirmative answer, and there are many people who know this from me. Instead, I offered them the above advice, and I asked Allāh to reward all of those who went through this tribulation, being effectively coerced against their will, against their religious and medical convictions into take a potentially harmful injection (and some of them did suffer badly). I made duʿa that Allāh reward them for striving to be truthful and doing their best to obey the authorities, while also offering them advice on how to limit any potential harmful effects.
I do not see how any of the above can be considered sinful in the sight of Allāh and treated as following the ways of ʿAmr bin ʿUbayd al-Muʿtazilī towards the scholars and the way of the Surūriyyah towards the rulers, as was claimed by some.
The complaining students did not convey my position truthfully, nor accurately.
Now, the tables are turning and those who fanatically promoted the experimental injections—which were neither safe nor effective (except in modelling studies, which is crystal-ball pseudoscience used to manufacture narratives) are going to have to come to terms with the fact that they may have been the cause of injury and harm to health in thousands upon thousands of people, if not having sent a fair share to their graves (with sudden deaths, cardiac arrests, blood clots, strokes and so on). The lawsuits have already begun and will increase over time, especially as evidence of fraud in the manufacture and marketing of the injections becomes public knowledge.
In any case the faking of pandemics for plunder and profit is nothing new, it has only gotten more sophisticated and coordinated over time. Covid-19 followed the Swine Flu Scam of 2009 and the attempted Bird Flu Scam of 2005 and this time the perpetrators did a clinical job. They achieved it through military grade control and censorship of information through tight, integrated collusion between big pharma, big tech and big media, and careful coordination between captured institutions. However, Covid-19 is not the first and certaintly not the last pandemic scam.
We are already in the midst of the H5N1 Bird (Avian) Flu psychological operation, which is intended to target farming, meat and poultry, as well as to pick up from where Covid-19 ran out of steam, when the Darwinian virus went into hiding as soon as Russia invaded Ukraine.