Rising Doubts Over WHO’s Pandemic Treaty
Tuesday, Feb 13 2024
Alongside other captured institutions such as the FDA, CDC and their counterparts in other Western countries that play a role in facilitating the injection of the world's population with toxic adjuvants to maintain generational markets for big pharma, the WHO is the major connecting vehicle through which everything is tied together on a global scale.
Bought out by private interests, the WHO has been trying to get agreement on amendments to the IHR and a new pandemic treaty that will enable stricter lockdown measures, forced vaccination, quarantine and the use of vaccine certificates (potentially being used as a global digital ID). Covid-19 was a trial run to get various systems operational, in preparation for digital ID, CBDCs and social credit scores tied to carbon allowances.. They tried to continue the scam with Monkeypox, Bird Flu but these attempts never gained traction. Now, they are scaring everyone with fear and superstition through the imaginary, made up ‘Disease X’ for which there is a vaccine in preparation. In reality, these faked pandemics are being manufactured for the vaccine which is already in existence, and these new mRNA vaccines serve numerous agendas, a major one being population control.
However, there has been growing discontentment and pushback and this is because the perpetrators, operating behind institutions, overplayed their hand with the Covid-19 Pandemic fraud, revealing the iron-fist behind the curtain. All aspects of the fraud have been exposed, from top to bottom. The publication in journals of the devastating effects of the snake-oil mRNA injections continues to snowball. Some nations have explicitly stated they will not be part of any new treaty and concerns are being raised and discussed in various parliaments.
It is in this context that Tedros Ghebreyesus is expressing worry and fear on behalf of his leash-pullers.
Recent words from Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, head of the World Health Organization (WHO), have stirred worries worldwide about the agency’s pandemic treaty efforts.
Doubts are growing as people question WHO’s real goals.
Tedros aimed to calm fears, saying the treaty would boost global health and fairness, not just empower WHO.
Yet Dr. Peter McCullough, a top expert, warned it might lead to undue global control, veiled as beneficial intentions.
He stressed that the treaty could erode national control and lacked openness.
The treaty, under review by WHO‘s 194 countries, seeks to better handle future pandemics. It suggests binding rules forcing countries to follow specific health measures.
Critics fear these rules could limit freedom, pushed by unelected officials without clear justification.
WHO’s reliance on private funding, which makes up 85% of its budget, sparks debates about its autonomy.
The concern is that donor influence could sway WHO away from the public good, favoring political motives instead.
The treaty proposes broadening “pandemic” and “health emergency” definitions, making health guidelines mandatory, and giving the WHO chief more power to declare emergencies.
It also recommends monitoring member states, sharing data, and allowing WHO to manage national resources, including money and patents.
In addition, this WHO initiative faces global pushback, challenging its aim for health-based global influence.
The resistance reflects growing distrust in vaccine mandates and fear of unilateral health narratives, showing a community cautious of global directives lacking a solid basis.
This opposition is a notable hurdle for once-unchallenged authorities, tackling perceived overreach in the name of health and safeguarding national and individual freedoms.
THe Rio Times — February 12, 2024
Source: The Rio Times
