Reports News Search
The Heads of Hamas, Khomeini and Iran: Spreading Twelver Shīʿism in Gaza

Posted by Abu Iyaad
Originally published August 2013
Filed under Groups & Parties

The original version of this article was published in 2013.

HAMAS IS AN OFFSHOOT of the the Muslim Brotherhood (al-Ikhwān al-Muslimīn) which has Freemasonic origins (through Jamāl al-Dīn al-Irānī). The aims of al-Ikhwān are to supplant Muslim lands with a Ṣūfī-Shīʿite nexus, alongside democracy, as well as unity of religions. From the core doctrines of al-Ikhwān is Taqrīb, which is nearness and closeness with the Rāfiḍah Shīʿah, considering them brethren upon Tawḥīd and Īmān. Ismael Haniyeh is a senior political in Hamas and Khaled Mashal is also a high-ranking political leader. Below are two pictures where both of these Ikhwānis are found at the wathan (idol) of the pagan idolator and enemy of Abū Bakr and ʿUmar (رضي الله عنهما), ‘Ayatollah’ Khomeini.

One should note that this connection is not something merely political, wherein shared economic and political interests are pursued, as may happen between nations despite opposite ideologies or religious convictions. Rather, this is an issue of religion and one of deep respect and veneration of the likes of al-Khomeini, a mushrik, kāfir, ṭāghūt, on grounds of religion.[1]

This indicates what Hamas really stand for. It is effectively a tool of the Rāfiḍah and the Zionists at the same time at the expense of the lives, property and welfare (and creed) of the Palestinians in Gaza. Its leaders believe in democracy and pluralisation and upon their ignorance, they do not recognise and distinguish between Īmān and kufr, Tawḥīd and shirk.

It should also be noted that Hamas as an organisation, does not represent the Palestinian Muslims as a whole, and not everyone who is under the banner of Hamas or supports them may necessarily agree with the views and beliefs of its leaders.

While opposing and resisting an occupying force that commits genocide, ethnic-cleansing, land-theft, kidnapping and so on is legitimate for the Palestinian people, Hamas being kept in power over the Palestians is actively supported by the Israeli right because it allows them to pursue their long-term strategic objectives of ethnically cleansing all of Palestine.

Thus, groups like Hamas, as well as being agents of Iran, serve as Trojan-horses for the Zionists, who under the guise of destroying Hamas and allegedly providing a "better future for Palestinians"[2], after supporting and propping them them, deprive the Palestinians of their lands and homes. To use the words of Netanyahu, “This is our strategy.” Hamas has been known historically to be infested with spies and infiltrators.

Netanyahu reveals the strategy

For more details, see Hamas and the Israeli-right.

Spreading Twelver Shīʿism (Shirk, Kufr) in Palestine

The Mushrik leaders of the Twelver Shīʿīte use the plight of the Palestinians as a means to spread their kufr and shirk, to extinguish the light of Tawḥīd and Sunnah. This the strategy of Iran and its Hezbollah proxies in giving material support to Hamas. It is a cover for spreading Shīʿism.

In the video above, a khaṭīb from Gaza in Palestine, illustrates the infiltration and penetration of the Rāfiḍah Shīʿites and their shirk into the Gazan population. He shows hats or balaclavas sold in Gaza in which there is written “Yā Hussain”, and books written by Hassan Naṣrallah of Hezbollah and Ahmadinajad, being distributed. He also quotes the Mushrik, Kāfir Hassan Naṣrallāh as saying:

By virtue of the Iranian revolution, we have been able to spread Shīʿism into the homes of the Palestinians.

He says: “These pigs [Rāfiḍah] have nothing to do with us”, and explains how they slaughter Sunni Muslims in every place, in Iraq, Syria, Yemen and Lebanon.

Hamas Homage to Khomeini on Every Visit to Iran

Tweeting from his now suspended account Khaled Mashal wrote:

None of the leadership of the Hamas movement or Ikhwan have visited Iran except that they pass by the grave of Imām al-Khomeini out of respect for his role…


What unites us with Iran and its leaders are not just shared interests, but it is genuine brotherhood and shared faith.

Those leaders of Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood who never visit Iran except that they pass by the wathan (idol) of al-Khomeini—the mushrik, ṭāghūt, kāfir, enemy of Islām, and of Jibrīl (عليه السلام), and of Abū Bakr and ʿUmar (رضي الله عنهم), in order to pay their respects—do not know the foundations of Islām and what distinguishes Īmān from kufr and Tawḥīd from shirk. It exposes the depths of ignorance of these people.

When ʿUmar (رضي الله عنه) took over Jerusalem, it was handed to him by its keepers with awe and fear in their hearts, this being the effect of genuine, deeply-rooted Tawhīd and īmān in the hearts of Muslim leaders and their subjects. Today, people look to the likes of these people, who do not know the difference between the Tawḥīd of the Messengers and shirk in Rubūbiyyah that is found with the heads of the Rāfiḍah. They think victory will come through support from a people who claim ʿAlī is their God, the Prophet's Companions were disbelievers and ʿĀʾishah (رضي الله عنها) is what they claim she is, may the consecutive and continuous curses of Allāh be upon them.

When Ahl al-Sunnah who are upon the way of the Salaf in actualising Tawḥīd point out these factual realities, based on knowledge and insight, and out of genuine and sincere concern for the Palestinians, their Islām, their lives, their properties and their lands, ignorant and delusional Takfīrī Retards, such as Daniel Haqiqatjou and those led by him, in their drunken stupor mixed with rank hatred, consider it hypocrisy, apostasy and alliance with the Zionists!

Rather, simply for pointing out that Allāh’s aid comes through Tawḥīd and that Allāh’s blessings and aid are removed with the emergence of shirk in a population (such as Twelver Shīʿism ) in which others are invoked alongside Allāh, and simply for exposing and refuting the Rāfiḍah and the Khawārij, and the tremendous harm they bring upon the ummah of Islām, often serving as agents of the people of disbelief, and for refusing to participate in further destabilisation of Muslim lands by creating commotion and agitation against rulers and governmens (which only results in greater repression against the population and opportunities for external enemies to weaken Muslim nations further), in the topsy-turvy world of Haqiqatjou, one leaves Islām, becomes a hypocrite and a Zionist agent!

Ikhwani Hamas Leaders, Ismael Haniyeh and Khaled Mashal, Paying Respect at the Wathan (Idol) of al-Khomeini in Iran

The picture on the left shows Ismael Haniyeh and the one on the right, Khaled Mashal.

They are paying respect at the tomb of a kāfir, mushrik who said that when he conquers Madinah, he will pull out the “two idols” of Abū Bakr and ʿUmar (رضي الله عنهما) and who describes ʿĀʾishah (رضي الله عنها) with a despicable description, may consecutive and continuous curses be upon his likes.

This is the ideology of al-Ikhwān al-Muslimīn in general, it is the extreme Irjāʾof al-Jahm bin Ṣafwān towards the Rafiḍah, Qubūriyyah on the one hand, and on the other, it is Khārijiyyah against the lands of the Muslims which Allāh blessed with the daʿwah of Shaykh Muḥammad bin ʿAbd al-Wahhāb (رحمه الله), in which there are no awthān (tombs of dead people) worshipped alongside Allāh.

Hamas and Ahmadinejad (Suspected Crypto-Jew) Celebrating Iranian Revolution

Here is another picture of Ismael Haniyeh on a podium in Iran behind him are huge pictures of al-Khomenei and al-Khamenei:

As Theodore Herzl said, the ‘anti-semite’ is the Zionist's best friend, and Zionism thrives and rages upon ‘anti-semitism’, and extinguishes and dies in its absence. Given this, one should be not be deceived by the rhetoric of the Rāfiḍah Shīʿah, and in this case, the rhetoric of Ahmadinejad whose family is suspected of Crypto-Judaism.

Hamas and the Destruction and Delivering of Gaza to the Zionists

A video in Arabic showing the alliance between Hamas and the Iranian Rāfiḍah, the kufr and shirk of the latter, and the emptiness of their claims (the Rāfiḍah) in supporting the Palestinians.

The video begins with a woman lamenting over the destruction of Gaza saying it is finished. Then leaders of Hamas are shown, boasting of the support from Iran, but which in reality is nothing and has little to show on the ground. It also shows how the Rāfiḍah believe that the meaning of Allāh in the Qurʾān is ʿAlī (رضي الله عنه) and numerous other statements of disbelief, polytheism and misguidance, and observing that the Shīʿites find in these leaders of Hamas—when they praise the leaders of Iran—active callers to, or protectors of Shīʿism, thereby serving its geopolitical agendas.


01  The Khārijites or those affected by their poison are known to make takfīr of rulers and governments with dubious grounds, and given the above details, the following are highly appropriate and legitimate questions which have been asked, keeping in mind that the heads of the Twelver Shīʿites are disbelievers, polytheists, their disbelief being clear and explicit:

  1. Is the one who shows religious loyalty to the polytheists (mushriks) of Irān a Muslim?
  2. Is the one who seeks material aid from the polytheists, idolaters, enemies of Allāh (عز وجل), enemies of Jibrīl (عليه السلام), enemies of Abu Bakr and ʿUmar (رضي الله عنهما) and enemies of ʿĀʾishah (رضي الله عنها) a Muslim? Or is it permissible to seek military aid from the disbelievers?
  3. Is the one who rules by secular laws, and who believes in democracy and pluralization, and makes them a structure for rule and rulership a Muslim?
  4. Is the one who exonerates the Twelvers of Iran and Iraq, the Nuṣayrī Bāṭinīs of Syria and the Twelver Houthīs of Yemen of their crimes in slaughtering Sunnis, being treacherous to the Muslims thereby, is he a Muslim? Is he giving allegiance to polytheists over people of Tawḥīd?

These questions are raised only to expose the double-standards and contradictions of those upon the siyāsah of the Rāfiḍah and the Khāwārij whose enmity, hatred and incitement is reserved for Sunni Muslim lands.

02  While we make duʿa for the Muslims in Palestine, for the repulsion of the aggressors and an end to their campaign of ethnic cleansing, war crimes and genocide, we must keep in mind that there are powers and forces competing for the hearts, minds and leadership of the Palestinians, and at this particular junction in time, Irān has a large hand to play, through its proxies (Hezbollah, Houthis, Hamas) and in which lies the danger of Twelver Shīʿism.

For this reason, the ideological leanings of Hamas and their religious affinities and loyalties should be kept in mind and not be ignored.

03  Finally, the Rāfiḍah and the Ikhwān (representing Rafḍ and Khārijiyyah respectively) are enemies to the people of Tawḥīd, Sunnah and Jamāʿah. They both collaborate and cooperate with each other, pursuing the doctrine of Taqrīb (closeness, nearness) to further their agendas.

When you research into early Islamic history and learn that the activities of the Sabaʾiyyah against ʿUthmān bin ʿAffān (رضي الله عنه)—in which they raised those slogans of “freedom”, “justice”, “equality”—these activities were directly responsible for the emergence of the first two sects in Islām, the Shīʿah and the Khawārij, you will then start to understand the various slogans of these people of “Hākimiyyah”, “Imāmah”, “Social Justice” and what they really intend by them.

It will then also start making sense to you how the names of al-Khomeini, Quṭb, Mawdudi and Hassan al-Banna are mentioned together, because they are the revivers of ideologies and slogans of the Sabaʾites, Khārijites and Rāfiḍah.

The Ikhwān do not intend the freedom, justice and equality afforded by the Tawḥid of the Messengers, but they mean something else. We see them oblivious to the worship of idols by millions in their land of Egypt and at the same time they make allegiances and alliances with the Pagan Magian Rāfiḍis, neo-Ṣafawids of Iran.

Both the Rāfiḍah and Ikhwāniyyah have designs on the Gulf countries which by and large represent Tawhid and Sunnah, due to the daʿwah of Shaykh Muḥammad bin ʿAbd al-Wahhāb (رحمه الله), alongside what there is of sin, disobedience and what is unpleasing to Allāh. However, Tawḥīd with major sin is better than shirk in Rubūbiyyah (as found with the Rāfiḍah) and Ulūhiyyah (grave-worship in many countries) with apparent righteousness.

There is no doubt that the presence of the Rāfiḍah and Khārijiyyah in these Gulf countries is used and will be used, along with Ṣūfism, to cause dissension and to weaken (or destroy) the light of Tawhid and Sunnah, may Allāh protect the lands, rulers, scholars and subjects of these lands from such evil and the lands of the Muslims in general from the plots of the enemies for whom the Rāfiḍah and Khārijites are tools and agents.

1. While Sunni Muslim states and leaders may, out of pragmatism and beneficial interests, have agreements and cordial relations with Shīʿītes at the state level, this is worldly and is from mudārāt (tactics of diplomacy) and is not driven or supported through validation of their religious doctrines and their misguidance or compromise with respect to them.
2. Meaning, as displaced refugess given aid and shelter elsewhere, this being from the point of the view of the Zionists, which is getting them off the land.

Join our mailing list to receive content updates.

© Abu Iyaad — Benefits in dīn and dunyā


Enter your search term and hit enter.