ABUIYAAD
Reports News Search
The Presence of Ikhtilāf (Differing in an Issue) Does Not Constitute Evidence

Posted by Abu Iyaad
Translated July 2002
Filed under Fiqh & ʿIbādah



Abū Sulaymān al-Khaṭṭābī (رحمه الله) said:[1]

[The existence of] ikhtilāf [in a matter] is not a proof, rather the explanation of the Sunnah is a proof against the opposers, whether they be from the first [Muslims] or the later ones.”

A-Hāfiẓ Ibn ʿAbd al-Barr (رحمه الله) said:[2]

Ikhtilāf is not a proof in the view of anyone that I know from the Fuquhā of this Ummah, except the one who has no vision, who has no knowledge, and who has no proof in his saying”.

Shaykh al-Islām Ibn Taymiyyah (رحمه الله) explained:[3]

And it is not for anyone to seek the saying of anyone as a proof in the matters in which there is dispute. Rather, the proof is in a text, consensus (ijmāʿ) and an evidence deduced from them (text and consensus) whose premises and foundations are established by Sharīʿah evidences. Not just the sayings of some of the scholars, for verily the sayings of the scholars, evidences are sought for them by Sharīʿah evidences. These sayings themselves are not be sought as the Sharīʿah evidences.



Footnotes
1. Aʿlām al-Ḥadīth 3/2093
2. Jāmiʿ Bayān al-ʿIlm 2/229
3. Majmūʿ al-Fatāwā (26/202-203)

Join our mailing list to receive content updates.



© Abu Iyaad — Benefits in dīn and dunyā

Search

Enter your search term and hit enter.