ABUIYAAD
Reports News Search
REPORT • Monday, 23 Oct 2023

Excerpts from ‘The Preaching of Islam’ by Thomas Arnold

Drawing upon hundreds of resources written in more than ten languages, British Orientalist scholar Thomas Walker Arnold (d. 1930) provides a picture of the spread of Islām different from that of modern loons and rabid Islām haters. Download as a file.
By Abu Iyaad


Table of Contents

1 — Introduction
2 — Crusaders Accept Islām After Being Robbed and Cheated by Fellow Christians
3 — Crusaders Abandon Negative Perceptions of Muslims and Accept Islām After Interactions
4 — Native Christians Welcomed Muslim Rule to Escape Tyranny of Fellow Christians
5 — Christian Copts of Egypt Welcomed the Rule of Muslims to Escape Byzantine Oppression
6 — The Christians of Arabia Willingly Accepted Islām and Aided Muslims Against the Persians
7 — Christians Preferring the Justice and Toleration of Islām to Escape Persecution by Christians
8 — Patriarch of Antioch (1199 AD): Muslims Sent by God to Establish Justice Among Christians
9 — Christians of Syria and Jordan Welcoming Muslim Armies With Profound Respect
10 — Islām Saved Christians From Self-Destruction and Oppression and Gave Them Security and Justice
11 — Christians Rushed to the Purity of Islāmic Monotheism From a ‘Bastard Oriental Christianity’
12 — Islām Spread Swiftly Through Removal of Superstition, Corruption and Injustice
13 — 20,000 Jews, Christians and Magians Accepted Islām After Death of Imām Aḥmad bin Ḥanbal
14 — What Attracted Christians to Islām and Led Them to Conversion
15 — The Spread of Islām to Persia: Zoroastrians Welcome Muslims as Deliverers From Tyranny
16 — The Spread of Islām to Spain: Warmly Welcomed by Persecuted Jews, Down-Trodden Slaves and Social Classes
17 — Conclusion

8. Patriarch of Antioch (1199 AD): Muslims Sent by God to Establish Justice Among Christians

Arnold writes:[1]

Michael the Elder [1199 AD], Jacobite Patriarch of Antioch, writing in the latter half of the twelfth century, could approve the decision of his co-religionists and see the finger of God in the Arab conquests even after the Eastern churches had had experience of five centuries of Muhammadan rule.

After recounting the persecutions of Heraclius, he writes:

This is why the God of vengeance, who alone is all-powerful, and changes the empire of mortals as He will, giving it to whomsoever He will, and uplifting the humble — beholding the wickedness of the Romans who, throughout their dominions, cruelly plundered our churches and our monasteries and condemned us without pity — brought from the region of the south the sons of Ishmael, to deliver us through them from the hands of the Romans.

And, if in truth, we have suffered some loss, because the Catholic churches, that had been taken away from us and given to the Chalcedonians, remained in their possession; for when the cities submitted to the Arabs, they assigned to each denomination the churches which they found it to be in possession of (and at that time the great church of Emessa and that of Harran had been taken away from us); nevertheless it was no slight advantage for us to be delivered from the cruelty of the Romans, their wickedness, their wrath and cruel zeal against us, and to find ourselves at peace.’[2]



Footnotes
1. The Preaching of Islam (1896), p. 54.
2. Michael the Elder, vol. ii. pp. 412-13. Barhebræus, about a century later, wrote in a similar strain. (Chronicon Ecclesiasticum, ed. J. B. Abbeloos et Lamy, p. 474.)




© Abu Iyaad — Benefits in dīn and dunyā

Search

Enter your search term and hit enter.