ABUIYAAD
Reports News Search
REPORT • Monday, 23 Oct 2023

Excerpts from ‘The Preaching of Islam’ by Thomas Arnold

Drawing upon hundreds of resources written in more than ten languages, British Orientalist scholar Thomas Walker Arnold (d. 1930) provides a picture of the spread of Islām different from that of modern loons and rabid Islām haters. Download as a file.
By Abu Iyaad


Table of Contents

1 — Introduction
2 — Crusaders Accept Islām After Being Robbed and Cheated by Fellow Christians
3 — Crusaders Abandon Negative Perceptions of Muslims and Accept Islām After Interactions
4 — Native Christians Welcomed Muslim Rule to Escape Tyranny of Fellow Christians
5 — Christian Copts of Egypt Welcomed the Rule of Muslims to Escape Byzantine Oppression
6 — The Christians of Arabia Willingly Accepted Islām and Aided Muslims Against the Persians
7 — Christians Preferring the Justice and Toleration of Islām to Escape Persecution by Christians
8 — Patriarch of Antioch (1199 AD): Muslims Sent by God to Establish Justice Among Christians
9 — Christians of Syria and Jordan Welcoming Muslim Armies With Profound Respect
10 — Islām Saved Christians From Self-Destruction and Oppression and Gave Them Security and Justice
11 — Christians Rushed to the Purity of Islāmic Monotheism From a ‘Bastard Oriental Christianity’
12 — Islām Spread Swiftly Through Removal of Superstition, Corruption and Injustice
13 — 20,000 Jews, Christians and Magians Accepted Islām After Death of Imām Aḥmad bin Ḥanbal
14 — What Attracted Christians to Islām and Led Them to Conversion
15 — The Spread of Islām to Persia: Zoroastrians Welcome Muslims as Deliverers From Tyranny
16 — The Spread of Islām to Spain: Warmly Welcomed by Persecuted Jews, Down-Trodden Slaves and Social Classes
17 — Conclusion

14. What Attracted Christians to Islām and Led Them to Conversion

Arnold writes:[1]

While there was so much in the Christian society of the time to repel, there was much in the character and life of the [Muslim] Turks to attract, and the superiority of the early Ottomans as compared with the degradation of the guides and teachers of the Christian Church would naturally impress devout minds that revolted from the selfish ambition, simony and corruption of the Greek ecclesiastics.

Christian writers constantly praise these [Muslim] Turks for the earnestness and intensity of their religious life; their zeal in the performance of the observances prescribed by their faith; the outward decency and modesty displayed in their apparel and mode of living; the absence of ostentatious display and the simplicity of life observable even in the great and powerful.[2]

The annalist of the embassy from the Emperor Leopold I to the Ottoman Porte in 1665-1666, especially eulogises the devoutness and regularity of the Turks in prayer...

Many a tribute of praise is given to the virtues of the Turks even by Christian writers who bore them no love ; one such [Alexander Ross] who had a very poor opinion of their religion, speaks of them as follows :

‘Even in ... Alcoran you shall find some jewels of Christian Virtues; and indeed if Christians will but diligently read and observe the Laws and Histories of the Mahometans, they may blush to see how zealous they are in the works of devotion, piety, and charity, how devout, cleanly, and reverend in their Mosques, how obedient to their Priest, that even the great Turk himself will attempt nothing without consulting his Mufti; how careful are they to observe their hours of prayer five times a day wherever they are, or however employed. How constantly do they observe their Fasts from morning till night a whole month together; how loving and charitable the Muslemans are to each other, and how careful of strangers may be seen by their Hospitals, both for the Poor and for Travellers; if we observe their Justice, Temperance, and other moral Vertues, we may truly blush at our own coldness, both in devotion and charity, at our injustice, intemperance, and oppression; doubtless these Men will rise up in judgment against us; and surely their devotion, piety and works of mercy are main causes of the growth of Mahometism.’[3]

The same conclusion is drawn by a modern historian , who writes:

‘We find that many Greeks of high talent and moral character were so sensible of the superiority of the Mohammedans, that even when they escaped being drafted into the Sultan's household as tribute-children, they voluntarily embraced the faith of Mahomet. The moral superiority of Othoman society must be allowed to have had as much weight in causing these conversions, which were numerous in the fifteenth century, as the personal ambition of individuals.’

Comment:

There is no doubt that in history fanatical Christians showed disdain for Islām and its adherents based upon either pride and arrogance or misconceptions. However, this did not prevent them from being truthful about observed realities which could not be denied with the senses.

As you can see from some of the quotes above, Islām-haters of the past had the decency to be truthful and just about the tremendous good they saw from Muslims, despite their hate and religious fanaticism.

This shows the difference between Christians of the past (and no doubt there are many like this that still exist today) and the dishonest and fraudulent such as Tommy Robinson and the unintelligent riff-raff of the EDL, Britain First and others posing as Christians, trying to incite their crusade.

They compare not to those hateful Christians for whom at least some respect can be given if only for the virtue of truthfulness in speech regarding the matter at hand. What is enraging them is that educated Christian people [the majority of them women too] are accepting Islām precisely because of the reasons given in the quote from Alexander Ross. Go and read it one more time.

So what they are doing is using the actions of sinful, evil Muslim criminals [which Islām condemns and for which it specifies capital punishment] to spread lies about Islām and Muslims as a means of hindering others from learning about Islām objectively, out of pure envy, jealousy and hate, all concealed under the alleged banner of opposing and fighting radical Islām.

Footnotes
1. The Preaching of Islam (1913), p.74-75.
2. Turchicæ Spurcitiæ Suggillatio, fol. xiii. (b); fol. xv. (b); fol. xvii. (b); fol. xx. (a). Veniero, pp. 32, 36. Busbecq, p. 174.
3. Alexander Ross, p. ix




© Abu Iyaad — Benefits in dīn and dunyā

Search

Enter your search term and hit enter.