POPULATION growth and the consequent need for population control and even ‘depopulation’ has long been a concern of the elites. Thomas Malthus, an 18th century economist, was one of the first people to voice concerns that there was insufficient farmland and therefore insufficient means to grow enough food to feed the burgeoning population.

Ironically, as we shall see in part 2, today’s government policies could be making this scenario more likely with some academics even suggesting deliberately creating the scarcity that Malthus feared in order to alleviate the ‘climate crisis’.

HENRY Kissinger, one of the most influential politicians of the last 50 years, who said ‘the elderly are useless eaters’, considered the idea of using food to control the population. In his 1974 ‘National Security Study Memorandum 200’ he outlined a number of countries of strategic importance for the US that he claimed had problems with population growth that might give them more economic and military strength. He advocated birth control programmes for those countries and suggested that if they did not do this willingly, withdrawing food aid to them may act as an incentive to make them comply.

Using food as a weapon is not just an idea. Russia did it in Turkestan in 1917, where they took control of food production and distribution, resulting in starvation and a drastic reduction in the indigenous population. The US and Canadian governments slaughtered the buffalo population to starve the indigenous people into submission.

FOR the last 70 years, fertility rates have decreased worldwide, with a total 50 per cent decline, according to the World Economic Forum. The reasons given typically include women’s ’empowerment’ in education and the workforce, lower child mortality and the increased cost of bringing up children. What is not mentioned by this pro-vaccine body is the possible impact of vaccines.

This however has been brought into sharp focus by the now well-documented adverse reactions to the Covid vaccines. A recent Project Veritas undercover report revealed Pfizer executive Jordon Trishton Walker confirming there were specific concerns about the Covid vaccines interference with women’s menstrual cycles: ‘There’s something irregular about their menstrual cycles. We will have to investigate that down the line, because that is a little concerning.’

His comment turned out to be an understatement. Analysis of a Pfizer database (released under a freedom of information request) of adverse events recorded during the first two months of the vaccine roll out found that of the 270 reported vaccinated pregnancies, adverse events were recorded for 34 of them. Of these 28 were cases of foetal or neo-natal loss, in other words where women lost their babies. How these vaccines were given emergency authorisation and recommended for pregnant women by the US Food and Drug Administration before developmental and reproductive toxicology studies had been completed is alarming. Notably, safety data on the use of Covid-19 vaccines in pregnancy is still not yet available.

WITH birth rates around the world in decline it is important to examine the extent to which our food, air and water contain ‘anti-fertility’ substances. The science journal Integrative Medicine, for example, stated: ‘The research is quite clear that metals and chemicals in air, water, food, and health-and-beauty aids are damaging fertility in many ways. These toxicants are causing men to experience relentlessly decreasing sperm count and function while women are suffering progressively worse anovulation [problems associated with the menstrual cycle described here], impaired implantation, and loss of fetal viability.’

There are four ways, it explained, in which environmental toxins can cause infertility:

• Endocrine disruption;
• Damage to the female reproductive system;
• Damage to the male reproductive system;
• Impaired foetal viability.