By Allah, the Ḥaddādīs requested me to make tabdīʿ of Safar and Salmān and those upon their way... so that people turn away from us. So I realised that this was a trick from the Ḥaddādīs themselves.

As for those who remain silent from explaining the truth to the people, they are not excused for their silence, even if they said: “We are not with them.”

Commanding the good and prohibiting the evil is a mighty foundation from the foundations of Islām. Islām is not established except by it.

A BEAUTIFUL STATEMENT dated 24 Shawwāl 1447 (12 April 2026) in which the Shaykh clarifies that he loves the scholars, has defended them for thirty years, and falsifies the claim that he reviles them.

Politics is part of religion, those who want to separate religion from politics are only trying to destroy the religion and relinquish it.

An important illustration of refutations between scholars and them assisting each other in reviewing and accepting the truth.

The noble shaykh Shaykh ʿAlī al-Ḥudhayfī gave advice to Ahl al-Sunnah regarding oppression and what has been found of loyalty to personalities and attacking people for clarifying the foundations of the Sunnah.

[The Ḥaddādiyyah] used to lie and slander (people), and slander (more). So we explained their shaykh’s lie, and his errors and misguidance, but they only increased their exaggeration in him.

Salafiyyah is creed, methodology, preaching and acting. Creed and action are binding (inseparable) and one cannot be separated from the other.

]It is not permissible for the one who knows of the innovations of the Muslim Brotherhood or other groups who have deviant beliefs and errors to remain silent about them.

A series of manhaj benefits from Shaykh Zayd al-Madkhalī regarding the foundations of the Sunnah, scholarly integrity, always seeking evidence and truth and avoiding bigotry.

A series of manhaj benefits from Shaykh Aḥmad al-Najmī regarding the foundations of the Sunnah, scholarly integrity, always seeking evidence and truth and avoiding bigotry.

Whoever seeks Allāh’s pleasure will inevitably be shown enmity by the dregs and worthless of the world, the lowly ones, the ignorant.

The approach of the Ḍhāhiriyyah is well known. It is the approach followed by Dawūd bin ʿAlī al-Ḍhāhirī, Abū Muḥammad bin Ḥazm and those who speak with their saying.

This is the famous incident in which the Shaykh was giving a lecture mentioning how these new groups had caused disunity in the land when he was assaulted.

It is obligatory upon the subjects to support the imām (ruler) in fighting them (the rebels), and even more so, the Khārijites.

“And if you find me erring or unjust in anything, I am prepared, by Allāh, to accept advice from a high school student or an middle school student.”

“And the truthfully insightful person takes a share of every spoils (of war), and associates with every group in the best way possible.”

“I say to you—my brothers and sons—myself or others, we give commendation based upon the current state of a man or [based upon] praise given to him in the past.”

It is Allāh’s Book, and the Sunnah of His Prophet [sas] that raise (and lower) people, and this is the rule in His creation.

A recurring doubt used by people of innovation and partisanship to hinder people from knowledge-based refutations of innovators or those who fall into opposition.

A series of manhaj benefits from Shaykh ʿUbayd al-Jābirī regarding the foundations of the Sunnah, scholarly integrity, always seeking evidence and truth and avoiding bigotry.

Can it be said that the division of Tawḥīd (into its categories) is a matter of convention that is indisputable?

The foundations of the religion, inclusive of the lawful and the prohibited have been made clear and the doubtful matters are those which are unspecified in the texts.

Tazkiyāt (commendations) are a time-bound testimony based on available knowledge, they cannot be used as an argument to support sides in knowledge-based matters or to defend personalities when their credal or methodological oppositions are made clear with evidence.

A series of manhaj benefits from Shaykh Rabīʿ bin Hādī regarding scholarly integrity, always seeking evidence and truth and avoiding bigotry.

Shaykh Ṣāliḥ al-Fawzān refutes the doubt that fighting Khārijites, terrorists and rebels is ‘fitnah’.

No one ever concealed himself behind the Sunnah and deceived people without Allāh [swt] exposing him, uncovering his veil and revealing to the elite and common folk what he used hide and conceal of deception

Lying inherently corrupts the order of the world, and the world is unable to function upon it, not in this life, nor the hereafter.

Various tribulations have engulfed the Salafī daʿwah, many of them coming from the direction of the Takfīrīs, and then the Ḥaddādīs, and from the elements of their innovations that crept into the daʿwah are premature judgements of tabdīʿ against scholars, shaykhs and students.

The use of intellectual terrorism, threats, intimidation, and dictatorial methods have no relation to Islām, its sciences, rulings, or ethics.

I know that some people in the Gulf states, I do not wish to name the country, they become angry when their students travel to the scholars of those countries, saying, ‘How can you abandon me?! You are doubting me! You... you!’

You must (follow) the knowledge of the Salaf and their methodology, their methodology in disparagement and appraisal (al-jarḥ wal-taʿdīl).

Since loving truth and disliking falsehood is from the perfection of man, then it follows that his love of truth will lead him to accept it, no matter where it lies and with whomever it lies

It is not appropriate to extract a clip from the words of the speaker (from a cassette) and then comment on it, due to absence of context and preceding discourse which clarify the meaning and intent.

It is not allowed for him to prefer the words one person over another until he has truly understood the words of both parties and distinguished between the one who is right and the one who is wrong.

It is a shame and disgrace that you say: ‘Did you read the books of Sayyid Quṭb yourself or did some of the students come to you?’

There is no doubt that Allāh is powerful over all things, as the Qurʾān has spoken of in more than a place, however, that which is inherently impossible, is not a “thing” by agreement of the intelligent.

From the integrity of Ahl al-Sunnah in their criticism is that they mention the speech that is being criticised verbatim without

When a person is spoken about, study him and take the statements of the critics, understand them and be sure about their authenticity.

Which sin and transgression is more severe than accusing a Muslim of what he has not (said or done). Rather, with the (very) opposite of what he is upon!

When the opposition is in a clear matter, in a clear matter of belief, is declared an innovator and expelled from Salafiyyah.

It is obligatory for any error to be explained to people, that it is an error, no matter how high the status of this person from whom this error occurred.

I advise the brothers to abandon exaggeration (ghuluww) — may Allāh bless you — for I am merely a critic, a critic, I criticised numerous, specific people for their errors.

Lying is to inform about something different to what it is, whether intentionally or by mistake.

No one can learn bravery, it is bestowed. The coward (remains) a coward, even if you gave him all of the weapons.

Many Salafīs know the truth, but they give it up very easily, yet those (Ḥizbīs), they know falsehood and they bite onto it with their molars.

From their methods are lying, trickery, deception, scheming and (so on) and nurturing people upon partisanship (taḥazzub) and bigotry (taʿaṣṣub).

Truth and falsehood are known not through mere glorification and extolling of scholars, but through what they speak and present of evidences.